Pay dispute update – report on last week’s strike, and next steps — June 1, 2016

Pay dispute update – report on last week’s strike, and next steps

strike picture
IWGB members supporting our UCU colleagues on the picket line on 25 May.

Thanks to everyone who supported last week’s UCU strike here at the University – we had a bunch of people on the picket line, and in addition many of you were also absent having taken unpaid leave.

The strike was called at a national level by UCU and is in response to the wholly unsatisfactory pay offer from the employers, which currently stands at just 1.1%.

This action by UCU was a good first step in forcing a better offer BUT it is clear that concerted action from all unions will be needed to impress on the University the extent to which staff are suffering, particularly in the face of recent changes to pension contributions, which have effectively meant a pay cut.

Currently there is talk of further strike days coinciding with graduations or with the August 15 A-level clearing day, and UCU have announced a work-to-rule which has already seen many academics resign their positions as external examiners.

At last week’s UoL IWGB branch meeting there was a really useful discussion of what part we should play in any future action – and a unanimous vote in favour of balloting formally to take strike action ourselves AND to make sure this coincided with the next national strike day.

We will be in contact about this soon, but in the meantime feel free to drop Danny a line at danny.millum@sas.ac.uk with any questions.

Please vote for Mark in the ICE elections — May 30, 2016

Please vote for Mark in the ICE elections

markandrebeccaIn March, staff in grades 1–6 voted resoundingly to have a fresh voice – IWGB – represent their interests in designing better information and consultation at the University. Thanks to your votes that’s having an effect: we used your feedback to submit proposals to the University for how this could work, and that’s set the tone for the negotiations going forward.

Although Chris has left, we at IWGB are determined to keep this up. Mark Murphy is standing as the IWGB candidate to replace Chris, and if elected he will help me to push for genuine change in the way we’re informed and consulted about what happens here. We need your support again to make this happen!

Lots of people may not realise that this whole process came about because of pressure from IWGB: over a year ago we collected signatures from across the University calling for staff to be better represented, that is what led to the setting up of this committee and an acknowledgement from the University that change is needed.

Throughout the process we’ve tried to involve everyone – now we want the chance to hold the University to account in implementing your ideas. Please vote for Mark Murphy on Tuesday – I know I will be.

Rebecca Dooley, levels 1-6 ICE negotiating rep

Branch meeting this Friday 27 June – 12.30 in room 246 — May 24, 2016

Branch meeting this Friday 27 June – 12.30 in room 246

agmvoting
Voting at last week’s national AGM

Please come to the monthly branch meeting this Friday 27 June 12.30-1.30.

It will be in room 246, on the second floor of Senate House.

We’ll be talking about the pay dispute, and reporting back on the strikes of the 25 and 26 May.

Also on the agenda will be the current ICE elections, recognition talks with Bouygues, and details of the decisions taken at last week’s national AGM.

Please come if you can! If you have any question or anything for the agenda just email uol@iwgb.org.uk.

 

Meet Mark Murphy, IWGB candidate for the vacant ICE rep position — May 22, 2016

Meet Mark Murphy, IWGB candidate for the vacant ICE rep position

murphy1
Mark Murphy, SAS Accounts Administrator and IWGB candidate

My name is Mark Murphy, and I’d like you to vote for me as the new Levels 1–6 negotiating rep, to work alongside Rebecca Dooley who is already doing a fantastic job. Staff in grades 1–6 are represented by just two reps, so it’s important that we work well as a team on your behalf.

A vote for me is a vote to continue down this track of change that staff voted for in March. Many of you voted for us before and backed our aim to make information and consultation here more inclusive and effective. It’s already working! The University has accepted that it needs to improve, so it’s vital to keep pushing our message.

Rebecca and my predecessor Chris have already put in a lot of work negotiating with the University and the Levels 7–10 reps. Although Chris has moved on, we in the IWGB want to finish the job that we have started. With your support I can help Rebecca continue negotiations to make proper information and consultation a permanent reality. So please vote again for IWGB!

See my full statement here, or drop me a line at mark.murphy@sas.ac.uk.

The IWGB’s full proposal for information and consultation reform can be found here.

Strike FAQs – updated! — May 20, 2016

Strike FAQs – updated!

UPDATE: Strike – 22 June 2016

The pay dispute is continuing with UCU now holding a series of rolling strikes across different HE institutions – the University of London strike will take place on Wednesday 22 June. All the other information below continues to apply – any question, drop Danny a line at danny.millum@sas.ac.uk or on 07783719479.

In other news, the IWGB will be formally balloting in July to join the ongoing industrial action.

Strike – 25 and 26 May 2016

1.What is the strike about?

The strike action next week is over pay, pay inequality and casualisation.

a)Loss in the value of our pay

Since 2009, the cumulative loss to our pay (compared to rises in RPI) is 14.5%.If inflation increases as predicted then by the end of this year the total real terms decline in our pay since 2009/10 could be as high as 17.5%. Meanwhile surpluses in the sector are over £1 bn.

b)Shameful pay inequality

Inequality in UK higher education is shameful with a gender pay gap of 12.6% (a difference of £6,103 per year) amongst academic staff in 2013/14. The total gender pay gap currently stands at a staggering £528 million.

c)The scandal of casualisation

75,000 university staff are on highly casualised ‘atypical’ academic contracts (at least 21,636 are zero- hours contracts). 67% of research staff are still on fixed- term contracts – more than 10 years since the fixed-term regulations came into force, around a third of these are contracts of 12 months or less.

2.When and where will the strike take place?

The strike is a national one, and will be taking place across all HE institutions on Wednesday May 25 and Thursday May 26.

3.Who has called the strike?

UCU members were balloted last month and voted overwhelmingly for strike action. The other unions have not yet balloted.

4.I am an IWGB member who supports the strike – what can I do?

The IWGB also rejects this pay offer and we will be consulting you about next steps over the next few weeks. Whilst IWGB members have not been balloted and are therefore not taking industrial action on these dates, a number of IWGB members will be unwilling, as a matter of principle, to cross UCU picket lines.

The IWGB has approached the University regarding this. The University has confirmed that, other than the deduction of pay for any absence, no further action will be taken against members who choose this course of action on 25 and 26 May.

If you do not wish to cross the picket line – you do not have to. Either do not come in, or come down and show your support, and notify your manager when you return to work that you wish to be put down as unpaid leave for those days.

5.Why strike?

Strike action shows the employers that we are serious in our demand for a fair pay rise. They have a choice as to how they spend their budgets – and they have chosen over recent years to build up surpluses and increase the proportion of non-staff expenditure. They will only pay us more if we force them to!

The pay deal that ends up being agreed is national – so it will affect us all!

6.What happens to my pay?

If you are on strike, or if you refuse to cross a picket line, you will be deducted your pay for that day. Obviously no-one likes to lose a day’s pay, but we have to weigh that up against the extra money that a successful strike will win us. Even extra 1% would more than make up for the lost days, and that 1% would be cumulative for every year to come.

7.What is happening on the days themselves?

The two days of strikes have been themed in London – the first one (25 May) will be highlighting gender pay inequality and the second (26 May) casualisation.

Wednesday 25th May timetable

8am onwards – pickets at home institutions

1.30pm – demonstration at UCEA (the employers’ organisation) in Tavistock Square

2.30pm – rally at the Conway Hall featuring Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell

Thursday 26th May timetable

8 am onwards – pickets at home institutions

1pm – demonstration at London Met (North campus) against casualisation.

8.What happens next?

This is only the start of the dispute. UCU will be looking to escalate to an exam-marking boycott, and the other unions will be balloting their members in time for the next strikes, which are likely to take place either in June and July depending on graduation OR on August 15 – the day that A-level results are announced, and clearing takes place.

9. Who can I ask for more information on this?

Feel free to drop Danny (danny.millum@sas.ac.uk) or Catherine (catherine.morrissey@london.ac.uk) a line with any questions.

IMPORTANT – UCU National Strike Action 25 & 26 May 2016 — May 13, 2016

IMPORTANT – UCU National Strike Action 25 & 26 May 2016

2526MayflierDMcrappydraft-1As you may be aware, UCU have balloted their members over the 2016/17 HE employers pay offer and following the rejection of the offer have called two days of strike action on the 25 and 26 May 2016.

The final offer from the employers was 1.1% This should be seen in the light of the real terms cut in income of 14.5% that HE employees have suffered over the last 6 years.

Therefore our colleagues in UCU here (and across the rest of the country) will be on strike on those days and will be setting up picket lines at Senate House and Stewart House.

We have written to the UoL UCU branch offering them the full support of the UoL IWGB branch and our solidarity with their action. We also suggested that they organise an open meeting on the issue so we will let you know about that as soon as we hear.

The IWGB also rejects this pay offer and we will be consulting you about next steps over the next few weeks.

Whilst IWGB members have not been balloted and are therefore not taking industrial action on these dates, a number of IWGB members will be unwilling, as a matter of principle, to cross UCU picket lines.

The IWGB has approached the University regarding this. The University has confirmed that, other than the deduction of pay for any absence, no further action will be taken against members who choose this course of action on 25 and 26 May.

Please remember that our pay will depend on the strength of support for these and any future days of industrial action!

If you have any questions at all please get in touch with danny.millum@sas.ac.uk.

 

IWGB serves notice of dispute at Royal College of Music — May 11, 2016

IWGB serves notice of dispute at Royal College of Music

JohnBullivant_square_web
Ocean CEO John Bullivant

John Bullivant
CEO
Ocean Integrated Services Ltd.

Helen Varley
Head of HR
Ocean Integrated Services Ltd.

11 May, 2016

By email

Re: Notice of dispute

I write to inform you that the failure of Ocean Integrated Services Ltd. to provide a satisfactory response on the issues outlined below has led to a trade dispute situation between our organisations as defined by s244 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and we will be balloting our members at the Royal College of Music for industrial action.

1. Failure of Ocean to respect workers’ previous terms and conditions;
2. Excessive workload, unfair distribution of work, unrealistic expectations on workload, and harassment.

I can confirm that the IWGB remains available for discussions, through the services of ACAS. If you would like to pursue this please contact me directly. If we do not receive a satisfactory response within a period of seven days then we shall write again, in line with the relevant legislation, to serve a notice of ballot.

Thank you very much in advance for your attention on this matter.

Kind regards,

Dr. Jason Moyer-Lee
President
IWGB

Annual leave claim latest — May 6, 2016

Annual leave claim latest

The University has made a disappointing response to the current annual leave claim – offering a mere two extra days, with these having to be earnt through long service.

In response to the IWGB’s proposal that equality of leave should also apply to outsourced staff, the University claimed that this was solely a matter for the contractors themselves.

The key point here is one of equality – if the University accepts, as its policies state, that all staff should be treated the same, then it cannot be a question of apportioning a day or two to levels 1-6 staff – they must get 30 days, the same as their colleagues. The same applies to those working in the same buildings but for different employers.

All the unions reject this offer – but the key to getting an improved deal will be putting pressure on the University!

Please let us know your thoughts via uol@iwgb.org.uk

Annual Leave – latest letter from IWGB to the University — May 5, 2016

Annual Leave – latest letter from IWGB to the University

holidayOur indefatigable branch secretary has just written to the University pressing them over the claim for equal annual leave for all staff at the University of London – see below:

Dear Kim,

I understand that the issue below was considered last week at the VCEG, and as a consequence I am writing to ask the University to confirm:

  • that its annual leave arrangements will be adjusted so that all staff, regardless of grade, receive 30 days’ annual leave
  • that this will also apply to outsourced staff working at the University.

This is of significant interest to all so it would be great to be able to disseminate good news as soon as possible.

Best wishes,

Catherine