IWGB general secretary invites UoL vice-chancellor to join boycott — December 10, 2018

IWGB general secretary invites UoL vice-chancellor to join boycott

Dear vice-chancellor Kopelman,

I’m writing to inform you, in case you’ve missed it on Twitter, of our boycott of the University of London (UoL). The boycott, which has already garnered an incredible amount of public support, ranging from the National Union of Students to the co-leader of the Green Party, the Shadow Chancellor, and Ken Loach, will continue until such time as all outsourced workers are brought in house on equal terms and conditions to their directly employed colleagues.

Given that we are signing up academics and institutions, I’d also like to invite you to join up. You can do so here. This is a great opportunity for you to get on the right side of history.

I appreciate that this may create a logistical conundrum for you as you work at Senate House, but being the progressive and modern institution that UoL intends to be, surely it could make some working from home arrangements for you?  Further, when the dust settles on this whole thing, at least you’ll have something to fall back on lest you be accused of presiding over the worst reputational damage in the history of the institution during your very short tenure.

Going from awarding Nelson Mandela his distance degree to being boycotted by trade unions, student unions, academics, and leading figures on the British left over unfair treatment of predominantly BME workers is quite a steep fall.

Either way, there is and always has been a very easy way out of this mess: bring the workers in house now!

Kindest of regards,

Dr. Jason Moyer-Lee
General Secretary
IWGB

Advertisements
Party on with IWGB —

Party on with IWGB

It’s that time of year again when employees up and down the country are getting into gear for the office Christmas party. Some people love the opportunity to kick loose, while others view the annual bash as an ordeal to suffer rather than celebrate.

For members of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) the festive ‘works do’ it an eagerly anticipated event – a time to glam up, let your hair down and brush off the stresses of the year at least for a few hours.

And, if every picture really does tell a story, that is exactly what happened at this year’s Christmas party. Happy holidays!

Academics, students and politicians to boycott University of London —

Academics, students and politicians to boycott University of London

More than 100 academics, politicians and others are backing a boycott of the University of London, including the iconic Senate House building, over the institution’s continued use of outsourced workers to provide essential services.

The supporters of the boycott, which include shadow chancellor John McDonnell MP, the National Union of Students and several high-profile professors, are demanding that the university end outsourcing and directly employ the outsourced workers that provide cleaning, catering, security and other services.

A full list of current signatories to the boycott will be found on the page http://www.boycottsenatehouse.com and https://iwgb.org.uk/boycottsenatehouse from Monday 10 December.

Outsourced workers at the University of London have been campaigning to be made direct employees with equal terms and conditions as other staff for over a year. These workers – who have worse sick pay, holiday pay, maternity pay and pension contributions than directly employed staff – have taken up to 15 days of strike action.

Instead of agreeing to negotiate with the workers, the majority of which are migrant and BME, the university has spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on heightened security in an attempt to stave off industrial action and protests. More information here, here and here.

After initially stating that it would bring services in-house last May, the university has now gone back on its commitment, only guaranteeing that a small portion of the workforce will be made direct employees by this summer.

The bulk of outsourced workers – maintenance, cleaners and catering – will remain outsourced at least until their contracts are up for tender in 2019, 2020 and 2021. At that point an in-house bid will be presented alongside other commercial bids, leaving the door open for the workers to remain outsourced indefinitely.

In the meantime, outsourced workers continue to suffer under a regime of bullying and discrimination. In 2018, the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain handled over 50 complaints on behalf of outsourced workers a the University of London. Notably the IWGB raised a complaint in July when it discovered that a senior manager of outsourcing company Cordant was supporter of the far right.

In October, the IWGB raised a separate complaint when the university failed to act after three separate women brought complaints of sexism and homophobia against a separate Cordant manager.

London School of Economics Anthropology Professor Dr David Graeber said: “It is completely reprehensible that people that provide such an essential service continue to be treated as second class workers by the University of London. As academics who benefit from the work of the cleaners, catering staff and other outsourced workers, we have a moral duty to stand in solidarity with them and boycott the university until it ensures that they are given the same terms and conditions as other staff.”

University of London cleaner Margarita Cunalata said: “For over a year, we have been asking the university to respect us as equal members of staff, yet it has made clear that it sees us as less than human. We have sent letters, we have been on protests and we have gone on strike, but the university doesn’t even have the basic decency to sit down with us and negotiate. We are tremendously grateful that academics are willing to support our fight by boycotting the university until it makes us direct employees.”

Kings College London Lecturer Nick Srnick said: “At a time when university Vice Chancellor pay is surging across the country, it is an outrage that the least well-off workers of the university continue to face a situation of hyper-exploitation and abuse. Yet there’s an easy solution to immediately improve the lives of the workers that keep the university running: join numerous other universities in bringing them back in-house and paying them a decent wage.”

The boycott asks supporters to not attend or organise events at the University of London central administration, which besides Senate House includes Stewart House, The School of Advanced Studies, the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies and Student Central (formerly ULU).

Events make up a significant proportion of the university’s income. According to its latest financial report, the University of London made GBP 43m from residences, catering and conferences in the year ending July 2018.

Plans to TUPE staff from University of London to Health Education England — November 22, 2018

Plans to TUPE staff from University of London to Health Education England

Dear all,

We are writing in our capacity as IWGB ICE representatives, as the ICE Forum has been sent documentation relating to the proposed TUPE transfer of all UoL staff to HEE, and we will be discussing this at the next Forum meeting, which will be taking place next Wednesday 28 November 2018.

The University has refused to allow us to release the actual documentation to affected staff, despite our objections, but it deals in essence with the email below that you have all received.

It is worth bearing in mind that on 28 September 2018 HR Director Simon Cain wrote to me that – ‘there is currently no discussion underway to transfer UoL staff to HEE’ – and yet now the University is moving with such haste that it intends to complete this transfer by 1 April 2019.

We have submitted the attached questions (HEETUPEtransferquestions) to the University / HEE for a response – but please do let us know if you have further queries you would like raising.

The key element of this move will be that staff will be forced to move from their current UoL pensions (SAUL or USS) into the less favourable NHS pension scheme.

The IWGB’s position is that that staff who have already been through a massive and traumatic restructure are now being made to pay again (this time via their pensions) for an accountancy error made at the highest levels.

Furthermore, there is no need for this to happen – UoL and HEE should be querying the VAT interpretation, especially since it in essence it represents the government taking money from itself.

The IWGB will be challenging this development in the ICE Forum – to escalate the fight then we need staff to get in touch and let us know what action they are prepared to take. If you want to fight this we will back you up all the way.

Best wishes

Danny

(on behalf of your IWGB ICE reps)

 

From: London and South East Communications 
Sent: 21 November 2018 15:00
To: All (London) <all.london@hee.nhs.uk>
Subject: Important update message for staff on the business relationship between HEE and University of London (UoL)

Dear colleagues,

Following my communication on 7 September 2018, I am writing to provide an update on the ongoing discussions regarding the current business relationship between HEE and the University of London (UoL). As you will be aware, UoL staff currently work alongside HEE staff as part of our operations in London.

I advised you previously that, following a HMRC review, it has been established that HEE will incur a £2.1 million VAT liability as a result of the current contractual arrangement between UoL and HEE. This change of taxation creates a cost pressure which is not sustainable going forward.

HEE’s Executive Team and the London Regional Management Group have considered all options available to HEE in reducing this cost pressure and we have determined that a full transfer of the service provision is now required.

This transfer of service provision will also require a transfer of employment for staff employed by UoL under this service provision. The transfer would be performed under the protection afforded by the legislative regulations set out under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 amended 2014 (known as TUPE). Those regulations include the requirement for full consultation with affected staff.

HEE have notified colleagues at UoL of our intention to transfer the service provision and we have requested a transfer date of 1 April 2019. UoL will now undertake their governance and consultation procedures in response to our request.

HEE have also notified our recognised trade unions of the transfer and we will be continuing our discussions with trade union representatives on 28 November 2018 at the London Staff Partnership Group and the wider HEE Social Partnership Forum on 10 December 2018.

I will continue to keep you updated on this matter and I fully expect that UoL will also be communicating with their trade union partners and employees in due course.

A set of FAQ’s relating to the effects and practicalities of TUPE will also be provided.

In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact your line manager, trade union representative, or HR team should you have any questions at this stage.

Best wishes,

Lisa.

Lisa Bayliss-Pratt
Chief Nurse and Interim Regional Director for London

Health Education England
Stewart House | 32 Russell Square London | WC1B 5DN

 

University of London no nearer to resolving historical asbestos issues highlighted nearly a year ago, emails reveal — November 19, 2018

University of London no nearer to resolving historical asbestos issues highlighted nearly a year ago, emails reveal

Emails show that not only is the University of London prevaricating over the issues raised in relation to the health of maintenance workers who have been exposed to asbestos, but that there are potentially more issues with areas previously declared clear.

 

From: Danny Millum <dannymillum@iwgb.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 17:00
Subject: Re: FW: John Barnett and asbestos
To: Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>
Cc: John Barnett <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>, Peter Kopelman <Peter.Kopelman@london.ac.uk>, Chris Cobb <Chris.Cobb@london.ac.uk>, Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>

Dear Simon,

I am writing once again with regard to the ongoing asbestos issue.

On 12 September you reassured me that:

  • The collation of historical data by a consultant is ongoing and good progress has been made.
  • The updated Asbestos Management plan will be published in the near future.

Since then I have heard nothing more. Instead, I have been informed by John today of the following email, which states:

Can you please notify all of our staff that access to the North Heating Chamber is limited by approval from Martin Prout, John Stone or John O’Donnell at this time as there is suspect materials that have been identified during the Lucien inspections in that area and until verified and treated accordingly access is restricted.  

In other words, we have still not made any progress on the historical asbestos issues on which I have been promised action since January (see email chain below) AND now it transpires that there are potentially more issues with areas previously declared clear.

To demonstrate the seriousness of the situation, John has asked me to attach his CT scan appointment – as a consequence of his condition (developed while working at the UoL for the last 30 years) he now has to attend such an appointment on a yearly basis.

Could you please as a matter of urgency provide the information promised above and confirm that a full investigation of the North Heating Chamber situation will take place?

Best wishes

Danny

 

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 11:02, Danny Millum <dannymillum@iwgb.co.uk> wrote:

 

Dear Simon,

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you – John has been on jury service.

With regard to the specific points we would like raised with P&FM, we would urgently request answers to the following:

  1. Following the departure of Paul Lambert, the UoL asbestos manager, who took over his duties and responsibiities?
  2. Can we see the documentation relating to the periodic asbestos checks that should have been conducted between Paul Lambert’s departure and the re-opening of the asbestos issue in 2015-16?
  3. During this period had asbestos danger areas been identified, and were they checked? Can we see this documentation?
  4. Can we see the asbestos management reports for the period after Paul Lambert’s departure?

If you could get this information to us as soon as possible that would be much appreciated.

Best wishes

Danny

 

On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 17:46, Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk> wrote:

Dear Danny,

Apologies as I realise that I have overlooked providing you with a response to your message below.

I have spoken to my colleagues in P&FM and understand the position regarding the work that has been completed coupled with the work being done and progress that has been made is as follows:

  • The collation of historical data by a consultant is ongoing and good progress has been made.
  • The updated Asbestos Management plan will be published in the near future.
  • Asbestos Management Surveys for the whole estate continue through our Framework Consultant and the aim is to be complete by year end 2018.

I have noted that it is important for the work to be completed as soon as possible.

It would be helpful for you to send me any specific points if any that you would like raised with P&FM and I will facilitate a response.

Best wishes,

Simon

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.co.uk]
Sent: 27 July 2018 16:05
To: Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>
Cc: John Barnett <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: Re: FW: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Simon,

Thanks for getting back to us – I think it would be really helpful for John and I if we could meet with you and whoever is working on this in P&FM so we can get a sense of what work is being done and what progress has been made.

If you could let us know when this might be possible that would be much appreciated.

Best wishes

Danny

On 20 July 2018 at 16:11, Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk> wrote:

Dear Danny,

I have now had the opportunity to discuss these matters with colleagues in P&FM.

I am informed that they are in the process of putting together an update, which will be made available to all staff shortly.

The work to draw together the University’s Asbestos Management history continues.  Largely for the reasons given in Kim’s previous response, but also due to some resourcing challenges within the P&FM team, this work will not be completed significantly before the end of September 2018.

Best wishes,

Simon

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.co.uk]
Sent: 19 July 2018 08:21
To: Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>
Cc: John Barnett <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: Fwd: FW: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Simon,

Many thanks for your email – has this meeting now taken place?

I have met with John, and he would like a date by which this material will be provided.

Best wishes,

Danny

From: Simon Cain [mailto:Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk]
Sent: 13 July 2018 14:57
To: Danny Millum <
dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

Just by way of update, I have arranged a meeting next week with relevant colleagues in PFM and will come back to you substantially following that meeting.

On a related note, I will be working with Sarah on the Health referrals that I understand have been made for a number of individuals.  We received confirmation of an appointment at the Royal Brompton within the last week and I have posted this on to the individual concerned.

Best wishes,

Simon

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 08 July 2018 17:50
To: Simon Cain <
Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>
Cc: Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <
Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>; Chris Cobb <Chris.Cobb@london.ac.uk>; Adrian Smith <adrian.smith@london.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos
Importance: High

Dear Simon,

Many thanks for your email.

The reason we would expect a comment from the University is that the death of a former colleague is obviously of massive significance to colleagues also exposed to asbestos, and the University had committed going forward (having failed to do this in the past) to keeping staff informed.

Could you therefore arrange a meeting with the relevant University manager in charge of the asbestos situation and in charge of the gathering of files (as if Kim is to be believed, this process has already begun)?

Best wishes

Danny

From: Simon Cain [mailto:Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk]
Sent: 05 July 2018 17:07
To: Danny Millum <
dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk>
Cc: Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <
Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>; Chris Cobb <Chris.Cobb@london.ac.uk>; Adrian Smith <adrian.smith@london.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

Just writing initially to acknowledge receipt of your email.

I have noted your questions and will confirm at the earliest opportunity who will be taking forward your request for information.

I will also confirm who will be providing updates moving forward.  I trust you will accept however that it would not be appropriate for me or the University to comment specifically on a named individual.

You will note that I have removed Claire Rae from the circulation list.  Claire is now on maternity leave and so I would grateful if you could not include her in future correspondence.

Best wishes,

Simon

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 03 July 2018 12:31
To: Simon Cain <
Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>; Chris Cobb <Chris.Cobb@london.ac.uk>; Adrian Smith <adrian.smith@london.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Simon

I am writing to you with regard to the issue below, given that Kim has now retired.

Having spoken to John we are both shocked at the way the University has continued to deal with this issue. Kim promised us this information on 5 February. He then continued to procrastinate, knowing full well that he was about to retire, and that this would become ‘someone else’s problem’.

Could you please inform us who is now taking responsibility for providing this information?

We were also promised by the University that they would keep affected staff apprised of all asbestos-related developments going forward. Once again, this is not being adhered to. We have become aware of another former University employee, Roger Blake, who also died of mesothelioma. This obviously is of crucial interest to staff – and yet the University has failed to pass on this information.

Can you explain why this has happened and who is responsible?

If you could urgently either respond to these queries or direct us to the relevant person that would be much appreciated.

Best wishes

Danny

From: Kim Frost [mailto:Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk]
Sent: 04 June 2018 13:41
To:
dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

I understand that John attended his appointment at the Royal Brompton Hospital and that an advice report has been sent to him for review. Others have also had appointments or been offered them.

We are compiling the documentation which as you’ll appreciate goes back over a number of years and is held in a variety of formats and locations. We are keen to do this thoroughly and to be sure we have it all. This is not something that can be done quickly and I estimate will need a number of weeks to complete.

Best wishes

Kim

Kim Frost
University Secretary and Director of Human Resources
University of London
Senate House
Malet Street
London
WC1E 7HU
Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8026 Web: www.london.ac.uk

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 31 May 2018 15:08
To: Kim Frost <
Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk>
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos
Importance: High

Dear Kim

I am writing to follow up on this – nearly three months has elapsed, and we have had neither the documentation nor even confirmation of any timescale for this.

Could you get back to me as soon as possible with this information?

Best wishes

Danny

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 01 March 2018 17:41
To: Kim Frost <
Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk>
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Kim,

Many thanks for getting back to me – if you could let us know when you have a timeframe that would be most helpful.

Best wishes

Danny

From: Kim Frost [mailto:Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk]
Sent: 28 February 2018 16:12
To: Danny Millum <
dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk>
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

Much of this information is in paper form in archives and assembling it is not an overnight task. Once it is collated electronically we will be able to make it available. I cannot yet give a timeframe but hope to have a better estimate in a few days

Best wishes

Kim

Kim Frost
University Secretary and Director of Human Resources
University of London
Senate House
Malet Street
London
WC1E 7HU
Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8026  Web: www.london.ac.uk

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 25 February 2018 12:57
To: Kim Frost <
Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk>
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; ‘John Barnett’ <Johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos
Importance: High

Dear Kim

Would you be able to confirm when the documentation referred to below will be available, as it is now more than 5 weeks since the original request?

Best wishes

Danny

From: Kim Frost [mailto:Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk]
Sent: 05 February 2018 10:43
To: Danny Millum <
dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk>
Cc: Claire Rae <
Claire.Rae@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

Thanks for this. Claire has been in contact with our Occupational Health advisers and will be in touch with you today to arrange private appointments with a chest physician for John and Dennis. Please obtain similar signed authorisations from the others who would like to do this.

We are compiling documentation on asbestos management for the last decades but you will appreciate that for the earlier decades this needs to be recovered from paper archives and will take some time. We will share this when that is done

Best wishes

Kim

Kim Frost
University Secretary and Director of Human Resources
University of London
Senate House
Malet Street
London
WC1E 7HU
Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8026  Web: www.london.ac.uk

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 02 February 2018 14:17
To: Kim Frost <
Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos
Importance: High

Dear Kim

We have now provided the relevant signed agreements, and have still not received the substantive response you promised.

John and Dennis are feeling extremely stressed re the slow handling of this issue, and have asked me to reiterate their request, namely:

  1. All documentation relating to asbestos management at the University of London for the last 30 years
  2. An acknowledgement from the University of responsibility for the damage to his health and a suitable offer of compensation
  3. Immediate CT scans for all potentially affected staff (this latter point is extremely important – staff have thus far only received OH checks (and this only after demanding these were demanded by the IWGB), and as John’s OH check failed to reveal his lung damage, it is clear that these are completely inadequate)

Furthermore, I have a list of more maintenance workers who have requested scans – can this be arranged please:

John O’Flaherty

Adam McTaggart

Peter Barraclough

Ashley Frampton

Matt Bayles

Neil Holmes

Matt Lee

If you could get back to me as soon as possible that would be much appreciated.

Best wishes

Danny

From: Kim Frost [mailto:Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk]
Sent: 23 January 2018 11:21
To: Danny Millum <dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

Could I please ask you to get John to provide his signed agreement for us to share information about this with you? You’ll understand that we need explicit consent from the individual when dealing with these issues. In the meantime our specialist advisers are investigating these issues so that we can provide a substantive response.

Best wishes

Kim

Kim Frost
University Secretary and Director of Human Resources
University of London
Senate House
Malet Street
London
WC1E 7HU
Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8026    Web: www.london.ac.uk

From: Kim Frost
Sent: 18 January 2018 09:27
To: ‘Danny Millum’ <
dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk>
Cc: ‘john’ <
johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>; ‘Emiliano Mellino’ <emilianomellino@iwgb.co.uk>; ‘Mariachiara Valsecchi’ <mvalsecchi@iwgb.co.uk>; ‘Jason Moyer-Lee’ <jasonmoyer-lee@iwgb.co.uk>; ‘Henry Chango-Lopez’ <henrychangolopez@iwgb.co.uk>; Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; Chris Cobb <Chris.Cobb@london.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: John Barnett and asbestos

Dear Danny,

I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your email. We will be in touch soon.

With best wishes

Kim

Kim Frost
University Secretary and Director of Human Resources
University of London
Senate House
Malet Street
London
WC1E 7HU
Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8026  Web: www.london.ac.uk

From: Danny Millum [mailto:dannymillum@iwgb.org.uk]
Sent: 16 January 2018 10:50
To: Kim Frost <
Kim.Frost@london.ac.uk>
Cc: ‘john’ <
johnbarnett1010@hotmail.co.uk>; ‘Emiliano Mellino’ <emilianomellino@iwgb.co.uk>; ‘Mariachiara Valsecchi’ <mvalsecchi@iwgb.co.uk>; ‘Jason Moyer-Lee’ <jasonmoyer-lee@iwgb.co.uk>; ‘Henry Chango-Lopez’ <henrychangolopez@iwgb.co.uk>; Simon Cain <Simon.Cain@london.ac.uk>; Ghazwa Alwani-Starr <Ghazwa.Alwani-Starr@london.ac.uk>; Chris Cobb <Chris.Cobb@london.ac.uk>
Subject: John Barnett and asbestos
Importance: High

Dear Kim

I am writing on behalf of John Barnett, the painter and decorator at the University of London.

John had an appointment with his GP on 8 December relating to a persistent cough. The GP was concerned, and arranged for a CT scan which took place on 13 December.

He received the results on 20 December – these indicated that he had pleural plaques on his lungs, which the consultant confirmed could only have been caused by prolonged exposure to asbestos in the workplace.

Pleural plaques typically take 10-20 years to manifest themselves. John has worked at the University of London for 30 years and so it is clear that the exposure took place here.

Further evidence that this is the case has now been provided by John, in the form of:

  1. A signed letter from Robin Thomas dated 13 August 2003 which states ‘I retain a record that you were working in the vicinity of the boilerhouse in Germanic Studies when there was a release of asbestos and that you entered the boilerhouse after the event and before the area was hygienically cleaned’.
  2. An improvement notice issued to the University of London by the HSE on 30 July 2002, which states that the University were in contravention of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and The Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations 1987 because ‘adequate arrangements have not been made for the management of the risk from exposure to asbestos to employees’.

John has suffered from a huge amount of stress as a consequence of this, has been prescribed diazepam and has been recommended that a heart monitor be fitted as a consequence of his heart palpitations. In addition he has also been forced to seek help from Camden and Islington’s I COPE counselling service.

As the above clearly demonstrates, the University has put his life at risk by exposing him to asbestos in breach of HSE regulations, and in addition his health is now suffering as a consequence of the stress caused by this diagnosis.

This is of course in addition to the recent asbestos issues discovered in 2016, which demonstrated that further exposure has occurred between 2003 and 2016, and in response to which the University has still failed to produce an asbestos management plan, in further contravention of HSE regulations.

As a consequence, John is requesting as a matter of urgency:

  1. All documentation relating to asbestos management at the University of London for the last 30 years
  2. An acknowledgement from the University of responsibility for the damage to his health and a suitable offer of compensation
  3. Immediate CT scans for all potentially affected staff (this latter point is extremely important – staff have thus far only received OH checks (and this only after demanding these were demanded by the IWGB), and as John’s OH check failed to reveal his lung damage, it is clear that these are completely inadequate)

Please could you respond to this email as a matter of urgency (the IWGB’s legal department and press office have also been copied in).

Best wishes

Danny

Danny Millum
Branch Secretary
University of London IWGB
https://iwgb-universityoflondon.org/

 

UoL’s outsourced workers to benefit from UK living wage rise — November 17, 2018

UoL’s outsourced workers to benefit from UK living wage rise

At last some good news. The lowest paid staff at the University of London (UoL) are set for a pay increase as both Cordant Security and Cordant Cleaning, the university’s outsourcing companies, confirm they will adopt the uplift in the rate of pay set by the Living Wage Foundation on 5 November.

It means the outsourced workers struggling with the rising cost of living in London will see their pay rise to £10.55 an hour, an increase of 3.5%. For workers in the rest of the country the rate will rise 2.9% to £9 an hour.

The salary boost for Cordant’s UoL staff, which is effective from 5 November, was confirmed in an email from Guy Pakenham, Cordant Cleaning Limited’s managing director.

In his response to repeated requests for information from Danny Millum, the University of London IWGB branch secretary, Pakenham said, “I can confirm that both Cordant Security and Cordant Cleaning [will] introduce the new LLW rate from the date of announcement and it is paid on the next applicable pay rate, which in this case, falls within November for all our affected staff.”

The UK living wage pay rate is a voluntary measure adopted by more than 4,700 employers and is calculated by assessing how much workers need to meet the basic cost of living in Britain. It is £1.17 higher an hour than the statutory national minimum wage imposed by the government for those over the age of 25.

Currently £7.83 an hour for workers who are over 25, the government’s national living wage, will itself rise to £8.21 an hour from next April. For 21–24-year-olds, the current rate of £7.38 will become £7.70; and the rate for 18-20-year-olds rises from £5.90 to £6.15.

 

 

Senior research fellows urge UoL to treat all workers the same — November 16, 2018

Senior research fellows urge UoL to treat all workers the same

While the University of London’s (UoL) senior management team continue to delay providing full details of how it will bring all staff in-house and confirm that they will do so by June 2019, academics continue to show their support for its precarious workers. Below is and open letter from fellows at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies confirming their concern for the workers in view of recent revelations about managers at Cordant Services.

Jules Winterton
Director
Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
University of London
Charles Clore House
17, Russell Square
London                                                                                                                                                                                       16 November 2018

Dear Jules,

We are fellows of the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS) who have signed this letter in support of outsourced workers at the Institute as we believe that all staff at the Institute should be treated equally.

We support the bringing of all outsourced staff in-house as a priority.

We kindly request on behalf of these workers that the Institute provides full details of how it will seek to bring all staff in-house and confirm that it will seek to do so by June 2019.

We are especially concerned about the outsourced workers’ position in view of the recent revelations about managers in Cordant Services, the company that employs these workers. Three women workers have brought the exact same accusations of sexism and homophobia against one Cordant manager. Another manager in charge of these staff had to be moved from this role after he was found to have shared xenophobic and far-right posts on social media. Given that the many of the outsourced staff are women, migrant and BAME, we share their concerns that they cannot be assured that they will be treated in a fair and non-discriminatory way until the University of London takes direct responsibility for their employment and working conditions.

We value our association with the Institute, and wish this association to continue, and we hope to have your support in ensuring that we can continue our association with an institution where all workers are treated the same regardless of their role.

We, the undersigned,

  1. Dr Sinéad Agnew, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (Faculty of Laws, University College London)

  2. Professor Diamond Ashiagbor, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (Kent Law School, University of Kent)

  3. Professor Rosemary Auchmuty, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (School of Law, University of Reading)

  4. Professor Ilias Bantekas, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (College of Law & Public Policy, HBKU)

  5. Dr Francis Boorman, Associate Research Fellow, History of Arbitration Project, IALS

  6. Lydia Clapinska, Associate Research Fellow, IALS (Office of the Parliamentary Counsel)

  7. Clare Cowling, Associate Research Fellow and Project Director, Legal Records at Risk project, IALS

  8. Dr Richard Danbury, Associate Research Fellow, IALS

  9. Dermot Feenan, Associate Research Fellow, IALS (Law and Compassion Research Network)

  10. Professor Rosemary Hunter, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (Kent Law School, University of Kent)

  11. Professor Harry McVea, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (Law School, University of Bristol)

  12. Professor Sa’id Mosteshar, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS (London Institute of Space Law and Policy)

  13. Professor Derek Roebuck, Senior Associate Research Fellow, IALS

Academics appeal to University of London to provide details on employment status of its outsourced staff — November 8, 2018

Academics appeal to University of London to provide details on employment status of its outsourced staff

More than 100 academics have signed an open letter to the director of the Institute of Historical Research (IHR) regarding the employment status of its staff

Dear Professor Fox

We are over 100 IHR seminar convenors who have jointly signed this letter in support of outsourced workers at the Institute, as we believe that all staff at the IHR – and indeed, across the wider University of London – should be treated equally.

While we welcome the IHR’s commitment to make bringing all outsourced workers in-house a priority, we would request on behalf of these workers that the IHR provide a full details of how this process will work, and a commitment (which the workers themselves have been very clear on) that they will all be in house by June 2019.

We are particularly concerned about the workers’ position in light of the recent revelation that a senior manager in charge of these staff on behalf of Cordant Services, through whom they are subcontracted, had to be moved from this role after he was found to have shared xenophobic and pro-far right posts on social media.

Given that the majority of the outsourced staff are migrant and BAME, we feel that we cannot be assured that they will be treated in a fair and non-discriminatory way until the University of London takes direct responsibility for their employment and working conditions.

We obviously treasure our seminar groups’ long association with the IHR, and would want this to continue, and we hope to have your support in ensuring that these seminars take place in an institution where all workers are treated the same regardless of their role.

We, the undersigned,

Dr Larne Abse Gogarty (University College London; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr James Baker (University of Sussex; Digital History Seminar)

Dr Catriona Beaumont (London South Bank University; Contemporary British History Seminar, and Voluntary Action History Seminar)

Professor Matthew Beaumont (University College London; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Chiara Beccalossi (University of Lincoln; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Guy Beckett (Birkbeck, University of London; History Acts Seminar)

Professor Jonathan Bell (University College London; North American History Seminar)

Dr Justin Bengry (Goldsmiths, University of London; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Professor Michael Berkowitz (University College London; Jewish History Seminar)

Professor Virginia Berridge (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; History and Public Health Seminar)

Dr Steffan Blayney (University of Sheffield; History Acts Seminar)

Dr. Jeff Bowersox (University College London; Modern German History Seminar)

Professor Alan Bradshaw (Royal Holloway, University of London; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Sean Brady (Birkbeck, University of London; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Dr Georgina Brewis (University College London; History of Education Seminar)

Dr Ludvine Broch (University of Westminster; Modern French History Seminar)

Dr Warren Carter (The Open University; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Lily Chang (University College London; Comparative Histories of Asia Seminar)

Professor Gregory Claeys (Royal Holloway, University of London; History of Political Ideas Seminar)

Dr Nicola Clark (University of Chichester; Society for Court Studies Seminar)

Dr Liesbeth Corens (Queen Mary, University of London; Low Countries History Seminar, and European History 1500 – 1800 Seminar)

Professor Penelope J. Corfield (Royal Holloway, University of London; British History in the 18th Century Seminar)

Dr Joseph Cozens (University of Essex; British History in the 18th Century Seminar)

Dr Ruth Craggs (King’s College London; London Group of Historical Geographers Seminar)

Dr Gail Day (University of Leeds; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Professor Filippo de Vivo (Birkbeck, University of London; European History 1500–1800 Seminar)

Professor Richard Drayton (King’s College London; Imperial and World History Seminar)

Dr Max Edling (King’s College London; North American History Seminar)

Professor Steve Edwards (Birkbeck, University of London; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Hannah J. Elizabeth (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; History and Public Health Seminar)

Dr Mike Esbester (University of Portsmouth; Transport and Mobility History Seminar)

Dr Elizabeth Evenden-Kenyon (Brunel University London; Religious History of Britain 1500–1800 Seminar)

Dr Charlotte Faucher (University of Manchester; Modern French History Seminar)

Professor David Feldman (Birkbeck, University of London; Jewish History Seminar)

Laura Flannigan (University of Cambridge; History Lab Seminar)

Dr Jana Funke (University of Exeter; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Dr Dion Georgiou (University of Chichester; Life-Cycles Seminar)

Professor Shiri Gilbert (University of Southampton; Jewish History Seminar)

Dr Stefan Goebel (University of Kent; War, Culture and Society Seminar)

Professor Anne Goldgar (King’s College London; Low Countries History Seminar)

Professor Martin Gorsky (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; History and Public Health Seminar)

Professor Richard Grayson (Goldsmith’s, University of London; War, Culture & Society Seminar)

Dr Craig Griffiths (Manchester Metropolitan University; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Dr François Guesnet (University College London; Jewish History Seminar)

Dr Bérénice Guyot-Réchard (King’s College London; Comparative Histories of Asia Seminar)

Professor Jane Hamlett (Royal Holloway, University of London; Studies of Home Seminar)

Dr Alana Harris (King’s College London; Modern Religious History Seminar, and Women’s History Seminar)

Professor Peter Heather (King’s College London; Earlier Middle Ages Seminar)

Professor Tim Hitchcock (University of Sussex; British History in the Long 18th Century Seminar)

Professor Kate Hodgkin (University of East London; Society, Culture and Belief, 1500–1800; Psychoanalysis and History)

Dr Sally Holloway (Oxford Brookes University; British History in the Long 18th Century Seminar)

Dr Eva Johanna Holmberg (Queen Mary University of London, and Helsinki University; Society, Culture and Belief 1500–1800 Seminar)

Dr Alejandra Irigoin (London School of Economics; Latin American History Seminar, and Economic and Social History of the Early Modern World Seminar)

Professor Heather Jones (University College London; War, Culture & Society Seminar)

Professor Andrew Jotischky (Royal Holloway, University of London; Crusades and the Latin East Seminar, and European History 1150 — 1500 Seminar)

Professor Ben Kaplan (University College London; Low Countries History Seminar)

Dr Innes M. Keighren (Royal Holloway, University of London; London Group of Historical Geographers Seminar)

Professor Sarah Lloyd (University of Hertfordshire; British History in the Long 18th Century Seminar)

Professor Gary McCulloch (University College London; History of Education Seminar)

Dr Jane Mackelworth (Queen Mary University of London; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Dr Anna Maerker (King’s College London; Public History Seminar)

Dr Christine Mathias (King’s College London; Latin American History Seminar)

Dr Charlotte Mathieson (University of Surrey; Transport and Mobility History Seminar)

Dr Daniel Matlin (King’s College London; North American History Seminar)

Dr Owen Miller (School of Oriental and African Studies; Comparative Histories of Asia Seminar)

Dr Joel Morley (University of Essex; Oral History Seminar)

Dr Anne L. Murphy (University of Hertfordshire; Economic and Social History of the Early Modern World Seminar)

Dr Andrew Murray (The Open University; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Raf Nicholson (Bournemouth University; Sport and Leisure History Seminar)

Dr Angel-Luke O’Donnell (King’s College London; North American History Seminar)

Professor Miles Ogborn (Queen Mary University of London; London Group of Historical Geographers Seminar)

Dr Daniel Peart (Queen Mary University of London; North American History Seminar)

Dr Christopher Phillips (Independent scholar; Transport and Mobility History Seminar)

Dr Eyal Poleg (Queen Mary University of London; European History 1150–1550 Seminar, and History of Liturgy Seminar)

Dr Robert Priest (Royal Holloway, University of London; Modern French History Seminar)

Dr Dominic Rahtz (University for the Creative Arts; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Thomas Rath (University College London; Latin American History Seminar)

Dr Tim Reinke-Williams (University of Northampton; British History in the 17th Century Seminar, and Life-Cycles Seminar)

Dr Huw Richards (London College of Communication; Sport and Leisure History Seminar)

Dr Charlotte L. Riley (University of Southampton; Reconfiguring the British: Nation, Empire, World 1600 – 2000 Seminar)

Professor Alice Rio (King’s College London; Earlier Middle Ages Seminar)

Dr Michael Rowe (King’s College London; Modern German History Seminar)

Dr Jack Saunders (University of Warwick; Reconfiguring the British: Nation, Empire, World 1600 – 2000 Seminar)

Dr Andrea Schatz (King’s College London; Jewish History Seminar)

Dr David Sim (University College London; North American History Seminar)

Dr Simon Sleight (King’s College London; Life-Cycles Seminar)

Dr Andrew W. M. Smith (University of Chichester; Modern French History Seminar)

Dr Peter Smith (University of West London; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Martin Spychal (History of Parliament; Parliaments, Politics and People Seminar)

Dr Iain Stewart (University College London; Modern French History Seminar)

Dr Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite (University College London; Reconfiguring the British: Nation, Empire, World 1600 – 2000 Seminar)

Professor Pat Thane (King’s College London; Contemporary British History Seminar, and Women’s History Seminar)

Dr David Todd (King’s College London; Imperial and World History Seminar)

Professor John Tosh (University of Roehampton; Public History Seminar)

Dr Marina Vishmidt (Goldsmith’s University of London; Marxism in Culture Seminar)

Dr Brodie Waddell (Birkbeck, University of London; Society, Culture and Belief, 1500 – 1800 Seminar)

Dr Erica Wald (Goldsmith’s, University of London; War, Culture & Society Seminar)

Professor Patrick Wallis (London School of Economics; Economic and Social History of the Early Modern World Seminar)

Professor Chris Waters (Williams College, Massachusetts; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Dr Rob Waters (University of Sussex; Conversations and Disputations Seminar)

Dr Janet Weston (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; History of Sexuality Seminar)

Dr Nick Witham (University College London; North American History Seminar)

Professor Nuala Zahedieh (University of Edinburgh; Economic and Social History of the Early Modern World Seminar)

 

London living wage uplift — November 6, 2018

London living wage uplift

The London Living Wage Foundation is encouraging employers to introduce its new ‘living wage’ rates of £9 an hour across the country and £10.55 in London immediately.

Below, Danny Millum requests confirmation from Simon Cain, the University of London’s director of HR services, that the institution’s low-paid workers will benefit from the increase.

 

Dear Simon

I am writing on behalf of outsourced workers at the University of London following the recent announcement of the London Living Wage uplift to £10.55 per hour.
I just wanted to confirm that this rate would be introduced for all affected staff from the start of November as in previous years.
Obviously this is matter of pressing urgency for these low-paid workers, and so I would appreciate if you could get back to me as soon as possible.
Best wishes
Danny
Danny Millum
Branch Secretary
University of London IWGB