Gran Celebracion – UoL IWGB AGM Y fiesta 2016! Sábado 23 de Abril, 4pm — April 5, 2016

Gran Celebracion – UoL IWGB AGM Y fiesta 2016! Sábado 23 de Abril, 4pm

agm2016-flyer-españolTe invitamos a participar en la reunion anual general (AGM) de la rama Universidad de Londres.
Donde podrás elegir a los oficiales para el próximo año y enterarte de todo lo que ha venido haciendo tu sindicato durante el año.

A continuacion celebraremos bailando con la mejor musica hasta el amanecer. Ademas habra una rifa sorpresa, servicio de comida, bebidas y mucho mas.

Todos son bienvenidos, incluido amigos y familiares!

Soas (Universidad de Londres) Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG

No te lo puedes perder!

Mas informacion llamar al 07922 810 798.

AGM & Fiesta 2016! 23 April, 4pm, SOAS —

AGM & Fiesta 2016! 23 April, 4pm, SOAS

agm2016-flyer-englishYou are invited to take part in the Annual General Meeting (AGM) for the University of London Branch. You’ll be electing the next year’s officials and find out what your union has been doing in the last year.

This will be followed by a celebration with music and fiesta until late. There will also be a surprise raffle, food service, drinks and much more. Everybody welcome, including friends and family!

Saturday 23rd April 2016, 4pm Soas (University of London) Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG

You can’t miss it! For more information call 07922 810 798 or email henrychangolopez@iwgb.org.uk.

Latest news from our courier collegues —

Latest news from our courier collegues

couriersYou might have seen in the papers that IWGB couriers have begun a legal bid to earn the minimum wage and the right to holidays and sick pay.

This is a ground-breaking case, and there has already been masses of press coverage, including in the Evening Standard and today’s Guardian.

If you want to donate to help fund these cases please visit the CrowdJustice site here, or contact office@iwgb.org.uk.

Test cases against London’s four main courier firms will try to end “meagre” pay of as little as £2 per job.

The capital’s “several hundred” bike couriers are usually hired as “independent contractors”, depriving them of many employment rights and meaning some can earn less than the equivalent of the £7.20-per-hour minimum wage.

Couriers Chris Gascoigne, Demille Flanore, Andrew Boxer and Maggie Dewhurst have lodged employment tribunal claims against their respective firms — Addison Lee, eCourier, Excel Group Services and CitySprint.

First IWGB radio podcast available now —

First IWGB radio podcast available now

radioIn an exciting new development, we’ve started our own radio station! Or at least – we’ve made our first podcast…

Soundcloud – https://soundcloud.com/iwgbradio

Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agWFhReS3WA

You can find the full contents below – but please get in touch with Anne at office@iwgb.org.uk with any feedback!

INTRODUCTION TO IWGB
The Forming of the Union – 1:00
Unison Fallout – 3:07
3 Cosas Campaign – 6:34
Legal Department – 9:19

NEWS
The ICE Elections – 12:57
European Court of Human Rights Case – 16:57
E-Courier Negotiation – 23:07
Courier Tribunal Case – 28:48

Saturday 23 April – AGM and Party — March 23, 2016

Saturday 23 April – AGM and Party

agm2015The University of London AGM is going to take place this year on Saturday 23 April, at SOAS, so please save the date and make sure to come along.

This year, to keep the meeting time down, each branch AGM will be separate to the central union one, so we are planning to start around 4pm, and then have a party afterwards.

More details will follow, but if you would like to stand for any of the Branch Officer positions (https://iwgb-universityoflondon.org/contact/current-officers/) then just make sure to text Danny (07783719479) before 2 April.

If no nominations are received by the deadline, a show-of-hands vote can be conducted for any position on the day of the AGM, if you decide you’d like to stand. Branch Reps  can be elected on the day.

Have a great Easter break!

Breaking news! ICE election results – grades 1-6 choose IWGB reps — March 22, 2016

Breaking news! ICE election results – grades 1-6 choose IWGB reps

rebecca
Rebecca Dooley
chris
Chris Josiffe

The results of the ICE elections at the University of London have been announced, with the IWGB winning both the levels 1-6 positions, in a clear mandate for the union to pursue formal recognition negotiations with the UoL.

Massive kudos to Rebecca Dooley and Chris Josiffe, who were both elected by a comfortable margin.

We were of course disappointed to miss out in the levels 7-10 vote (and offer of course  our congratulations to the winning candidates here), but hey, you can’t win them all! Maybe next time…

This is a huge victory for the branch, which was only formed 3 years ago, and it’s a great reflection on all those members who worked really hard to persuade people to support us. Thanks as well to all the non-members who voted for us too!

Our reps will enter the upcoming negotiations determined to secure the best arrangements possible for all staff at the University of London – and we’ll make sure to keep you posted re all developments.

We will also be making a formal recognition request to the University for the bargaining unit of levels 1-6.

UoL IWGB attends Topshop Living Wage rally! — March 18, 2016

UoL IWGB attends Topshop Living Wage rally!

On 12th March 2016 UVW and other activists, trade unionists and supporters protested at Topshop’s flagship store in Oxford Street to demand a Living Wage for its members who work as cleaners in the store and the sales assistants too all of whom are currently paid poverty wages. The IWGB attended the protest to show our support.
The protest developed into a road block of Oxford Street and a flash mob at John Lewis where the cleaners, also members of UVW, are paid poverty wages and excluded from the John Lewis partnership model thus depriving of the annual bonus that all other “partners” get a share in.
The protest was called following Arcadia Group’s refusal to negotiate with UVW and their strong defence of paying all their staff poverty wages despite claiming to “really value” them.
This protest marked the start of what UVW expect to be a long campaign to secure the Living Wage for Topshop staff.
Here are some videos from the demo:
httpsa//www.youtube.com/watch…
httpsa//www.youtube.com/watch…

There is also a petition which has over 28,000 signatures at the time of writing:
httpa//www.change.org/p/topshop-pay-your-cleaners-the-living-wage:::www.change.org/p/topshop-pay-your-cleaners-the-living-wage

IWGB Response to University’s Diversity and Inclusion Strategy —

IWGB Response to University’s Diversity and Inclusion Strategy

The University is consulting with members of staff and trades unions on the “University’s Strategy for Diversity and Inclusion” document. The IWGB has given its formal response to the draft document, highlighting the fact that the policy has not been extended to include outsourced workers, who make up a large number of the workforce at the University. We have provided some suggested amendments to the draft document. Please see the response sent to Kim Frost below.

Dear Kim,

I am writing to give IWGB’s formal response to the recent consultation on the University’s Strategy for Diversity and Inclusion draft document.

Whilst IWGB is delighted to see that the University intends to extend its commitment to equality and diversity beyond the minimum requirements of the law, we note with great disappointment that outsourced staff of the University, of whom there are several hundred working alongside us under different employers and with a variety of needs, are not mentioned. The document therefore needs to be revised to take account of these workers by name and to formulate key objectives that focus specifically on ensuring that they are clearly and actively covered by the strategy.

In particular I would like to draw your attention to the language of section 3 of the draft document, ‘The purpose of this strategy’ and section 4, ‘Our commitment to diversity and inclusion’, which omits to mention these colleagues as a named group and therefore implies that they are still not considered to be stakeholders here:
“The audience for this Strategy is all University stakeholders as the embedding of this commitment will benefit students, Alumni, staff, visitors and Trustees. Its objectives are tailored to address the needs, expectations and aspirations of these different groups”
“In this context, we welcome our duties under the Equality Act 2010 as part of our proud tradition of commitment to ensuring equality of opportunity for all, including our current, past and potential staff, students, external business partners and academic stakeholders, and the general public in London and beyond.” (Highlighting mine.)

I accept that this is possibly an issue with semantics only, and that the University may have intended that outsourced workers would fall under one of the groups highlighted here. If that is the case the document is unclear and should be amended to clarify this point. In stating this clearly the University would demonstrate consideration of and respect for these groups, who make a key contribution to the University on a daily basis and should therefore be mentioned by name.

I would also strongly suggest that Section 5, ‘Our key ‘One University’ diversity and inclusion objectives’, be extended to contain a ninth point, and amended in points 7 and 8. Again, it is striking that none of the objectives in the draft makes any mention of the University’s responsibility to its outsourced staff. By implication they are therefore not part of the ‘One University’ that this strategy seeks to promote. This is deeply disappointing. The closest the document comes to mentioning its outsourced staff is to say,
“We expect everyone who works for and with us to act in accordance with our commitment to diversity and inclusion and work with us to further these commitments.”

This is not sufficient. In simply saying ‘We expect … to act … and work with us’ the document appears to place the onus for ensuring that the University’s commitment is upheld very firmly onto its contractors and away from the University itself. As you know, IWGB firmly believes that the University can and should play an active role in taking responsibility for what occurs on its premises and in its name. I therefore suggest that the final few objectives and the closing sentence should read (amends in bold):
7. Embed our commitment to diversity and inclusion into all our central services and services provided by our contractors and subcontractors
8. Ensure systematic consideration of equality and diversity in our planning, in our purchasing and subcontracting decisions, and compliance with our duties under the Equality Act (2010)
9. Require contractors and subcontractors to uphold these principles, and take practical steps to ensure that they do so.
We expect everyone who works for and with us to act in accordance with our commitment to diversity and inclusion and will actively work with them to further these commitments.

I look forward to seeing a revised document which takes account of these points in due course.

Kind regards
Catherine

Catherine Morrissey
Secretary, University of London IWGB

ICE elections – don’t forget to vote! — March 16, 2016